Lean Manufacturing

One Point Lesson: Operational Availability vs. Rate of Operation

By Jon Miller Updated on July 2nd, 2021

What is Operational Availability?

First, a brief Japanese lesson, if I may. 可動率 is Operational Availability and is pronounced “ka-dou-ritsu”. 稼動率 is Rate of Operation and is pronounced “ka-dou-ritsu”. The pronunciation is exactly the same. Two out of three characters are the same, and the first character happens to have the same sound.

This is one of the many examples of wordplay that Taiichi Ohno was fond of using to teach the TPS philosophy. Two words that are nearly identical but are very different in meaning (as a point of interest, Operational Availability is also called “bekidouritsu” to make it possible to tell the two apart).

Availability is Reliability

可動率 as in Operational Availability is a measure of the reliability of equipment. Operational Availability is expressed as the percentage of time that the equipment can operate properly when it is needed for production. It doesn’t mean that the machine has high utilization and is running all of the time. The machine may not be running at all. The key point is that the equipment needs to be available when it is needed.

Operational Availability = Time equipment actually able to run / Time when equipment is needed to run

If the equipment was down 2 hours out of a 20 hour period when the equipment was needed (available only 18 hours), the Operational Availability would be 18 hours / 20 hours = 9/10 = 0.9 = 90%.

What is Rate of Operation

稼動率 is Rate of Operation and this is the ratio of the products being produced to the full capacity of the equipment running at standard operating hours. The formula is:

Rate of Operation = Rate of production on the equipment / Full capacity of the equipment based on regular hours

If you have a demand of 8,000 parts today and your machine is actually capable of running 10,000 parts on a regular shift, your Rate of Operation is 8,000 parts / 10,000 = 8/10 = 0.8 = 80%.

The production demand value for Rate of Operation must be only what is needed downstream and based on actual customer demand. In other words, if you have a high Rate of Operation because you are overproducing, you are in fact cheating yourself.

Running vs. Earning

The ‘ka” of 可 means “can” or “able to” so 可動 means “can move” or “able to run”. The “ka” of 稼 means “to make money” or “work” as in the type of work people are paid for as opposed to the scientific definition of work. So 稼動 means “working” or “making money”. Producing parts that don’t sell right now does not make money, according to the Toyota philosophy.

Taiichi Ohno emphasized that “able to run” rate was not the only goal but the “making money” rate was what really mattered for equipment. When focusing on doing kaizen on Operational Availability (可動率) you want to eliminate the equipment losses that result in the machine being unavailable when needed. Taiichi Ohno said Operational Availability should be 100%.

Work on Sales to Raise the Rate of Operation

When you focused on improving the Rate of Operation (稼動率) you should actually work on marketing and sales since it is a measurement of load on the available capacity, producing what was needed by the downstream process. Taiichi Ohno said the Rate of Operation need not be 100%, knowing that making this a target would result in loading the capacity with parts that are not needed right now (overproduction).

Practically, the ideal Rate of Operation number would depend on your customer service philosophy and backlog policy. If the Rate of Operation was at 100% then that means your sales (downstream pull) exactly matched your full equipment capacity during regular hours. This is not very likely to happen unless you are smoothing you schedule very effectively using heijunka, you have a backlog and there are orders waiting, or unless you are turning away sales.

Rate of Operation Can be Above 100%

When you see numbers in the news that Toyota factories are at a 116% Rate of Operation it generally means that they are running overtime or extra shifts because their numerator (demand) is greater than their denominator (available plant capacity based on regular hours).

If you focus on utilization, which is another measurement completely, the result will be high machine uptime, local optimization, overproduction but high inventory, poor cash flow, and bad overall performance. In the Lean manufacturing world, utilization and absorption are bad words. Understanding the subtle yet clear differences between kadouritsu / bekidouritsu and kadouritsu is critical to implementing and managing a Lean operation.


  1. R. Murray

    June 30, 2008 - 11:39 am
    Reply

    The clarity of OA is confusing. Take your fourth paragraph above. If I have a machine available 10 hours and only used 7, by your terms the OA would be 142% or would it be 100%.
    Dah!

  2. Jon Miller

    June 30, 2008 - 5:13 pm
    Reply

    Yes, Operational Availability is tricky.
    The definition is “time available to run / time needed” so it is measure of how readily available it is to run when it is needed to run.
    In your example, if you only used it 7 hours, that would be the “time needed to run” because you only have 7 hours of customer demand. You may have 10 hours available in a shift but that is used for Rate of Operation.
    If you had 1 hour of down time and the machine was available to run 6 hours, the OA would be 6 hours / 7 hours = 85% approximately.

  3. metias

    November 4, 2009 - 5:22 pm
    Reply

    Mr. Jon Miller, If I have 8 hours/shift as Standard working hour then machine down time takes 1 hour. The OA would be 7 hours/8 hours or it should be calculated included overtime to fulfill customer demand. So it becomes 8 hours total running machine (7 hours + 1 hour Overtime) divided by 9 hours which is 8 working standard/shift + 1 hour overtime (needed time to fulfill total customer demand ). So it would be 8 hours/9hours..? Thank You Jon

  4. Jon Miller

    November 4, 2009 - 11:27 pm
    Reply

    Hi Metias
    The calculation for operational availability would be 7 hours / 8 hours.
    Rate of operation would be 8 / 8 since the actual hour running is 7 + 1 (numerator) and regular hours is 8 (denominator).

  5. Okie

    November 12, 2009 - 11:27 pm
    Reply

    Hi Mr. Miller. The Ideal condition of OA is 100%, the factor caused lower than 100% is Machine Breakdown, how about Defect & Late working, etc, should we calculated them ? Thank You

    • Jon Miller

      November 17, 2020 - 12:21 pm
      Reply

      Defects etc. are losses in quality. This is part of the Overall Equipment Effectiveness calculation, OEE = Availability x Performance x Quality

  6. Nicolas

    November 16, 2020 - 8:52 pm
    Reply

    Mr Miller. If the time needed is 10 hours, and the machine is available the 10 hours but can only work at half its capacity, which would be the mechanical and operational availability?

    • Jon Miller

      November 17, 2020 - 12:20 pm
      Reply

      Hello Nicolas

      If the machine is only able to run at half capacity due to set up time, machine breakdowns, material shortages, etc. then its Operational Availability is 50%.

      If it is at half capacity because lack of customer demand, and the machine sits idle half of the the time, the Rate of Operation is 50%.

      I think what you are describing is reduced machine performance. This is part of the Performance loss of OEE – Overall Equipment Effectiveness.

      OEE is calculated by multiplying Availability x Performance x Quality.

      If Availability is 10 / 10 hours or 100%, and quality is 100%, if “it can only work at half its capacity” then Performance is 50%, the OEE = 100% x 100% x 50% = 50%.
      Performance loss includes reduced machine speed, idling and minor stops.

      Hope this helps.

  7. Joel

    July 2, 2021 - 12:50 pm
    Reply

    Mr. Miller,
    Its so nice to see someone explain OA the proper way. Here at my job they calculate OA by using the OEE method and then some. It can be frustrating…. Example: (8h day – breaks – Lack of demand – machine stops[quality][Performance] – tooling change – random other reasons someone wants to throw in – double dip into breaks and Demand)/ 8 hours = “OA”. They also calculate “OA” as an entire department. 40+ machines so when there is no demand for 10 of those machines that affects their “OA”. This goes all the way to the top and into other countries. We are owned by a Japanese company and they are doing the same thing. Drives me crazy. Thank you and sorry if this was more of a ramble than a question.

Have something to say?

Leave your comment and let's talk!

Start your Lean & Six Sigma training today.