problem solving
Lean

Heard on the Gemba: We Are Great Problem Solvers, But…

Avatar photo By Jon Miller Updated on August 23rd, 2023

great problem solvers

 

I recently heard from a Gemba conversation:

“We are great problem solvers, but the same problems keep coming back.”

Mastering Root Causes: Lessons from Toyota

When the countermeasures are off target, the problems reoccur. If problems reoccur for the same root cause, we have not in fact solved the problem. We have only temporarily contained it. Even if the same problem reoccurs due to a different root cause, it is possible that problem-solving was done without a thorough enough root cause analysis step. Problem-solving has not successfully happened until we can verify that the root causes have been identified and that the countermeasures applied to them are effective.

Taiichi Ohno wrote in the Toyota Production System:

“When a problem occurs, if the root cause analysis is insufficient, the focus of countermeasures can be off. That is why we ask ‘why?’ five times. This is the foundation of the scientific attitude of the Toyota system.”

 

Mapping the PDCA: Toyota’s 8 Essential Steps

In the Toyota way of working called TBP (Toyota Business Practice) there are 8 steps. These are synonymous with practical problem-solving and are mapped against the PDCA cycle.

     1. Clarify the problem

  • Start by offering detailed background, context, and historical insights. Observe directly where needed. Draft a clear and concise problem statement, and ensure there’s a consensus on it.

     2.  Break down the problem

  • By dissecting complex problems into component issues or themes, narrow the scope and identify any out-of-bounds or areas that can’t be addressed.

     3. Set the target

  • Establish a goal derived from the previously clarified and broken-down problem statement.

     4. Analyze the root causes

  • Visit the source and use methods like Pareto analysis, Ishikawa diagrams, and 5-why analysis to pinpoint actionable areas.

 5. Develop countermeasures

  • Focus on creating multiple experimental solutions for identified root causes instead of seeking a singular solution.

     6. See countermeasures through

  • See countermeasures through to their outcomes, persistently trying until the target is met.

 7. Evaluate both results and process

  • In order to learn whether the plan was followed or whether shortcuts were taken, whether results were achieved by luck or random variation or actual successful countermeasures, and systematically examine failed experiments or incorrect assumptions exposed while seeing countermeasures through.

   8. Standardize successful practices

  • Standardize effective practices, learn from setbacks, share insights, and refocus on the next goals, starting again with the PCDA cycle.

Beyond the Quick Fix: The Power of A3 Problem Solving

True, this method requires more time than simply identifying a problem and rushing to a fix. While swift solutions might be needed for temporary relief, they aren’t true resolutions rooted in addressing the core issue. However, when you meticulously identify and address root causes, problems are genuinely resolved, ensuring they don’t reappear for the same reasons.

The popular A3 thinking or A3 problem solving is nothing more than the process of developing and documenting this collaboratively,  one page of paper, often A3-sized. Becoming great at problem-solving is not a question of speed, brilliance, or heroic effort, it is a dedication to the proven PDCA process and practice, practice, practice…

For more resources please visit www.gembaacademy.com


  1. Len Canoot

    April 5, 2013 - 2:28 am
    Reply

    Very true. I wish it was a common culture to solve problems like this. I always use the analogy of a small coffee table to explain this kind of problem solving.
    In your living room, the coffee table is positioned in a crooked way and it looks awful! Solution-minded people will move the coffee table to its proper position.
    Problem solvers first ask:
    (1. Is this a problem?)
    2. If so, why is it in this position? (5-why)
    It turned out that the cleaning lady, after vacuum cleaning the room, moves the coffee table to clean around it, but never repositions it. She doesn’t do this because she is on the clock and only has limited time to vacuum clean the room. She has limited time because every time she cleans your home she needs to pick up her children from daycare. She has planned it very tight because she has very little money. Instead of moving the coffee table every time, you increase the wage of the cleaning lady (ofcourse the increasse in wage is more of a problem than a crooked coffee table…).
    Jon, I once read that the TBP was born in 2000 and is based upon A3 problem solving which is based on the Kaizen Story. The Kaizen Story is almost similar to TBP. Could you elaborate on the differences? I really would like to know more about these subjects.

  2. Mark Graban

    January 16, 2015 - 7:35 am
    Reply

    I often hear “We’re great problem solvers” but what they really mean is “We’re great at jumping to solutions.” Those solutions often don’t really solve the problem… but people THINK they’re good at this. That really gets in the way of improvement…

Have something to say?

Leave your comment and let's talk!

Start your Lean & Six Sigma training today.